<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind turbine noise affects health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/wind-turbine-noise-affects-health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/wind-turbine-noise-affects-health/</link>
	<description>Canadian blog focusing on wind turbines and news about the NWO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: noises toomuch</title>
		<link>http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/wind-turbine-noise-affects-health/#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>noises toomuch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windfarms.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>http://windturbinenoises.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://windturbinenoises.org/" rel="nofollow">http://windturbinenoises.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Metelka</title>
		<link>http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/wind-turbine-noise-affects-health/#comment-5848</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Metelka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windfarms.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-5848</guid>
		<description>Hello

I specialize in Noise and vibration Instrumentation used for research and enviromental noise monitoring. I would like to talk to someone about my theories including Acoustically coupled energy by the human body from Low Frequency(subsonic Sounds). Is there any Canadian Research being done in this area?

Andy Metelka
Novel Dynamics Test Inc.
RR#2, 13652 4th Line
Acton, On
L7J 2L8
519-853-4495
ametelka@cogeco.ca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I specialize in Noise and vibration Instrumentation used for research and enviromental noise monitoring. I would like to talk to someone about my theories including Acoustically coupled energy by the human body from Low Frequency(subsonic Sounds). Is there any Canadian Research being done in this area?</p>
<p>Andy Metelka<br />
Novel Dynamics Test Inc.<br />
RR#2, 13652 4th Line<br />
Acton, On<br />
L7J 2L8<br />
519-853-4495<br />
<a href="mailto:ametelka@cogeco.ca">ametelka@cogeco.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Nathaniel Mead</title>
		<link>http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/wind-turbine-noise-affects-health/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Nathaniel Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windfarms.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>To whom it may concern:

In recent months, it has come to my attention that someone has been borrowing my name and citing an article I wrote for Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) in a pathetic attempt to legitimize their position against wind farms.   My original article, titled &quot;The sound behind heart effects&quot; and published in the November 2007 issue of EHP, focused on the adverse effects of noise pollution.  The person who has attempted to steal my professional identity is jeopardizing my credibility as a science journalist and moreover is tarnishing the reputation of EHP by stealing text from my original article.  This is dishonest and insulting.

For the record, let me state the following: &quot;M. Nathaniel Mead does not advocate any position that seeks to undercut the potential of wind farms.  Indeed, M. Nathaniel Mead is completely in favor of wind power and espouses the speedy development of wind farms and other forms of renewable energy technology.&quot;

M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc
Freelance science writer
Durham, North Carolina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To whom it may concern:</p>
<p>In recent months, it has come to my attention that someone has been borrowing my name and citing an article I wrote for Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) in a pathetic attempt to legitimize their position against wind farms.   My original article, titled &#8220;The sound behind heart effects&#8221; and published in the November 2007 issue of EHP, focused on the adverse effects of noise pollution.  The person who has attempted to steal my professional identity is jeopardizing my credibility as a science journalist and moreover is tarnishing the reputation of EHP by stealing text from my original article.  This is dishonest and insulting.</p>
<p>For the record, let me state the following: &#8220;M. Nathaniel Mead does not advocate any position that seeks to undercut the potential of wind farms.  Indeed, M. Nathaniel Mead is completely in favor of wind power and espouses the speedy development of wind farms and other forms of renewable energy technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc<br />
Freelance science writer<br />
Durham, North Carolina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Mackie</title>
		<link>http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/wind-turbine-noise-affects-health/#comment-4658</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windfarms.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-4658</guid>
		<description>Who funds this site?  Mobile or Exxon?  You are spreading false information for what reason?  I see no empirical data to back any of your claims.  Show me the hard numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who funds this site?  Mobile or Exxon?  You are spreading false information for what reason?  I see no empirical data to back any of your claims.  Show me the hard numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
