Comments on: Global-Warming Authoritarianism http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/global-warming-authoritarianism/ Canadian blog focusing on wind turbines and news about the NWO Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:56:46 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Pierre http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/global-warming-authoritarianism/#comment-4380 Pierre Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:26:14 +0000 http://windfarms.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-4380 Just to add my view in the line of the preceding comment, as global temperature tends to stabilize, activists are forced to find new climatic concerns. Last summer, it was the dramatic melting of the north pole, then the huge moving of glaciers in Greenland or in Antarctic. What will be the next one ? Just to add my view in the line of the preceding comment, as global temperature tends to stabilize, activists are forced to find new climatic concerns. Last summer, it was the dramatic melting of the north pole, then the huge moving of glaciers in Greenland or in Antarctic.
What will be the next one ?

]]> By: Anonymous http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/global-warming-authoritarianism/#comment-4344 Anonymous Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:25:26 +0000 http://windfarms.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-4344 If we had a warm winter this year, you can bet many environmentalists would be claiming it as proof that global warming is happening. With our cold winter this year, they will say that the facts mean nothing. I agree with Dr. Lockitch, global warming is not proven. A consensus of grant-eating "scientists" is not an indication of truth. It is nothing more than a consnsus of grant-eating "scientists" and the science of their views cannot be validated by a vote. If we had a warm winter this year, you can bet many environmentalists would be claiming it as proof that global warming is happening. With our cold winter this year, they will say that the facts mean nothing. I agree with Dr. Lockitch, global warming is not proven. A consensus of grant-eating “scientists” is not an indication of truth. It is nothing more than a consnsus of grant-eating “scientists” and the science of their views cannot be validated by a vote.

]]>