(Meeting with Reporting and Interpretation)
* Please note meeting changes

Bill C-6 and Codex Alimentarius – Update

Editor:

Global Warming is a scam! Watch the video to understand how evil the plan and the people behind it are. The scam started with a directive from the Club of Rome and the rest is history.

The Finns have produced a half hour documentary that debunks the computer models predicting global warming and the IPCC’s use of climate data gleaned from the land of the reindeer and the Juhannus. Finnish scientists are not happy about their data being abused by the IPCC.
Subtitles in English are provided.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for this kind of penetrating analysis and criticism on American television.

Hat tip: John McMahon

Randall Hoven adds:

Wow! I finally watched the video. Here is what I remember of what our “scientists” will do:

(1) From a set of data, choose only the data points that support their theory, and ignore the rest.
(2) Refuse to release their data to other scientists and researchers.
(3) When new data refute their thesis, completely ignore the data.
(4) Show graphs upside down, without explanation.
(5) Assume a water-vapor feedback effect in computer models that is not only wrong, but also of the wrong SIGN, compared to physical observations.

This is bad, bad, bad. This is Orwellian bad. This is “get out of the house” bad.

American Thinker

Editor:  First I wish to thank a reader – Norma,  from South Africa for sending me this information.

Since 2006 I have been educating people on wind farms and the scam of MMGW. Unfortunately ever time I brought up the fact that wind farms are a fraud as is MMGW, I ended up being shunned by others fighting wind farms. They never wanted to deal with the fraud of MMGW even though without MMGW there was no case to build wind farms.

While I have fought to bring truth to the table, the vast majority fighting wind farms have remained under the delusion that “we need to embrace renewable energy” and “we just want the turbines sited farther from our homes”

Had those fighting wind farms pushed the “real truth” to the forefront the threat of wind farms would have be crushed  long ago.

From my earliest posts I have always put the truth forward, concerning Wind Farms, MMGW and the people connected to these scams which threaten both  the people of this country and the world.

Fighting  the industry, govt. and the “wind fighters” has been a long and draining experience but hopefully this article from New Zealand will give those in Ont., Canada and the World the strength they need to beat back both the fraud of Wind Farms and MMGW.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – WIND FARM DECISION

The New Zealand
Climate Science Coalition Hon Secretary, Terry Dunleavy MBE, 14A Bayview Road, Hauraki, North
Shore City 0622
Phone (09) 486 3859 – Mobile 0274 836688 – Email -
terry.dunleavy@nzclimatescience.org.nz

13 November 2009   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Huge wind farm in New Zealand canned on environmental, economic and
“climate change” grounds

Project Hayes was a 630 MW wind farm proposed for an upland plateau in

Central Otago in the South Island of New Zealand. An appeal to the

Environment Court has resulted in a judgement revoking the consent

granted about two years ago under New Zealand’s Resource Management Act.Several groups of local residents appealed the original consent on the

grounds that it would destroy an area of outstanding natural beauty. A

businessman from Auckland with property in Central Otago appealed on the

grounds that it was seriously uneconomic compared to alternative

generation and that, because fears of dangerous man-made global warming

were not supported by the evidence, there was no grounds to build it to

“fight climate change”. As expert witnesses, he engaged Professor Bob

Carter, Professor Chris de Freitas and Dr Kesten Green to put the case

that there were no grounds for believing in dangerous man-made global

warming and Bryan Leyland, a very experienced power systems engineer, to

demonstrate that wind power was expensive and an “uneconomic use of

resources”The hearing was held before four Commissioners at the Environment Court

where expert witnesses from both sides presented evidence and argued the

costs and benefits both for and against the wind farm over a period of

nearly two years.

In consideration of climate change matters under Section 7 of the Act,
the court listened carefully to arguments countering the IPCC
“projections” of impending dangerous man-made global warming put forward
by Carter, De Freitas and Green. However, their conclusion was that the
government had decreed that it believed in dangerous man- made global
warming, so they had to accept this decree. But the decision leaves open
the possibility that, as a result of the evidence presented, they gave
less weight to Meridian’s claimed climate change benefits than they
would otherwise have done.

 

Bryan Leyland presented evidence on the cost of wind farms worldwide and
presented a detailed economic analysis that showed that the cost to the
consumer of the power generated was about twice the cost of alternatives
like hydropower, geothermal or coal. When cross questioned on the
economics of the project he finally said: “If it cost half as much and
the wind blew strongest in the autumn instead of springtime, I would be
all for it.”

The 350 page judgement was delivered after nine months of deliberation
by the Court. The judgement acknowledged the outstanding value of the
landscape and loss of this value if the wind farm was built. The other
major component of the decision revolved around the magnitude of the
economic benefit to people and communities from building this wind farm
compared to alternatives. The court was very critical of the lack of
economic analysis undertaken by Meridian Energy, the promoters of the
project, and commented that “We find it extraordinary that in a $2
billion project more effort was not made by Meridian to value more of
the costs and benefits much more thoroughly. It is even more remarkable
that two governments endorsed the proposal without insisting that
Meridian carried out a cost benefit analysis, or requesting Treasury to
do so.”

The judgement of the Commissioners was three to one against the project.
The fourth commissioner, in a supplementary statement, said that “I come
down on the side of the Meridian’s proposal, albeit by a small margin”.

For New Zealand, this decision raises the bar for all other wind farm
proposals and implies that without a comprehensive and detailed economic
analysis on national terms, they will not be approved. As Bryan Leyland
demonstrated, such an economic analysis will show that wind farms in New
Zealand cannot compete with alternative forms of generation even if a
reasonable allowance is made for a carbon tax in one form or another.

For wind energy globally, the judgement drives home the fact that wind
farms embedded in major power systems are seriously uneconomic because
of high costs, an even lower capacity factor than is achieved in New
Zealand, the need for backup generation and for additional transmission
lines. All these wind farms are uneconomic and are commercially viable
because of only massive consumer funded subsidies. It also demonstrates
that if a wind farm is opposed on well supported environmental, economic
and climate change grounds, success is more likely.

Enbridge wind farm Kincardine

Editor:

It’s fitting that this petition comes to us as the “Stockholm Initiative”.  It was 1972 that the first UN Earth Conference took place. The aim then, as it is today, is  World Govt. and Depopulation under the guise of environmental concern. The UN and it’s environmental  programs will give untold power to unelected bodies and force the vast majority of humanity into lives of serfdom.

Please sign the petition and pass it on.

.

RETHINK CLIMATE POLICY! Open letter to the EU President, Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt

Attachment(s) from Hans Jelbring

stockholmpetition.pdf (petition)

1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment Part 1

(same bull – different decade)

Parents outraged, but expert says don’t worry about H1N1 double doses for kids

By Pat Hewitt (CP) – 14 hours ago

TORONTO — Families in several provinces were expressing outrage and concern Tuesday after they said their children got double the recommended dose of the H1N1 vaccine, but at least one medical expert said there’s little need for concern.

Parents in Ontario, Manitoba and British Columbia have reported that their children received the amount in the adult dose instead of the pediatric dose of the swine flu shot.

The Public Health Agency of Canada has received reports of the wrong dose being given out to children but cannot provide exact figures, said spokeswoman Nadia Mostafa, who referred the question to provincial health ministries.

The agency’s guidelines call for adults to receive 0.5 ml in a single shot of the adjuvanted vaccine. The recommendation for children between six months of age to nine years is two half doses at least three weeks apart.

A stressed-out father in Delta, B.C., urged parents to check the dose themselves before their children get the shot. Jeevan Tauro said his three-year-old daughter and 17-month-old son were given the 0.5 ml dose at a Burnaby walk-in clinic Nov. 3.

In a telephone interview from his home Tuesday, Tauro said he asked the doctor if they should return to the clinic three weeks later to get the second half of the flu shot, but the doctor told him not to.

The doctor said there was only one shot and no subsequent vaccination, “so that raised my doubts (as to) what he had actually done,” said Tauro.

The receptionist told him his children had received the full adult dose, he said.

Tauro said his son Ruhin developed a fever the next day, and suffered a seizure four days later and was rushed to hospital. He said a pediatrician told him two days later that Ruhin’s high fever was related to the flu shot and that the fever had caused the seizure.

Canadian Press

This is the real truth ,coming from Teresa Forcades, a nun at the monastery of Sant-Benet, in Monserra-Barcelona. She is a doctor physician specializing in internal medicine, PHD in public health at Barcelona’s university, specializing in the USA at the State University of New York. She gives verifiable scientific data and the disturbing irregularities related to this subject. This is relevant to all countries, all people.The interview is in Spanish with clear subtitles in English.You need a PHD to convince you , here is one !!

Note – I received a call this morning from Keli Hogan, Committee Clerk for  the Senate Committee on Bill C-6. Shawn Buckley will be speaking to the Senate Committee,  Nov 25th

Editor:

I received the information below via email today and decided to make some phone calls.  I spoke with several staff from the  offices listed below. My question to each of them was – Are you aware that Bill C-6 is a precursor to Codex Alimentarius?

Only one person I spoke with had  heard of Codex Alimentarius.  If the staffers never heard of Codex and its implications for Canada, what knowledge do the Senators have?

Do the Senators think  Bill C-6 is benign? Do they understand the implications for Canada and its people if  Bill C-6 passes?

Two things are apparent and need to be answered by the Senators.

1) If they do not understand the implications of Bill C-6 and Codex they are not in a position to make the decision they are being asked to make.

2) If they know,  they are traitors of Canada and its people.

Please contact the Senators below and do two things. Demand the committee accommodate Shawn Buckley and request information from the Senators pertaining to their knowledge of Codex Alimentarius.

Bill C-6 and Codex Alimentarius together are a powerful cocktail which poses a serious threat to the sovereignty of Canada.

Pick up the phone and start making calls.

48 HRS TO GET A CRITICAL MESSAGE TO 12 KEY SENATORS

Here’s the issue: Bill C-6 is now being reviewed by the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs. Their job is to review Bill C-6 in detail, hear from witnesses and make recommendations to the rest of Senators before the 3rd and final reading and vote. This Committee will give the rest of the Senate a final analysis of Bill C-6 based on what they have heard. But they will not have heard from Shawn Buckley.

And by extension, us.

Shawn Buckley, constitutional lawyer and author of the Charter of Health Freedom, has been invited as 1 of the key 14 national witnesses to appear before this Committee. That’s the great news.
To have him admitted to this chamber is an honour. And now, for the bad news. It’s on a day, when he will be in Federal Court. He is in a lock down at this trial for 3 weeks. He has been hired to challenge the validity of a section in the Food and Drug act, and show how the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is being violated. It is an unprecedented case and the Social Affairs Committee apparently, won’t wait.

As of Friday October 30th, the Committee has not given him another option to appear.

NO SUBSTITUTES

It is imperative that he be allowed to give his testimony before this Committee. We all know his perspective is absolutely essential and irreplaceable. There is no alternative. No one has spoken for us, for the Constitution.

The first phase of the Stop Bill C-6 Emailing and Letter Writing Campaign was successful. Many veteran and emerging Health Freedom groups, collectively, created a division in the Senate to force a review in Committee.
We made an impact and had emails quoted in the Senate, so they are hearing us.

THE BIG ASK

YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE AN EXPERT TO TALK TO THE SENATORS, THAT’S WHAT SHAWN IS FOR!

All we have to do is make our voice heard. And that we want Shawn Buckley to have the opportunity to truly represent our interests in detail.

Please take a few minutes to PHONE, EMAIL AND FAX your concerns.

It’s really easy to do and can make a big difference.

There are 12 senators and 1 committee clerk. We must reach them all so please contact as many people from the list below as you can! Our CNHC group is very active. Please GET YOUR ACTIVIST ON today and again tomorrow.

It’s best to send short, strong and constructive written communication by email or fax. This time we have to call because we can’t risk not being heard. Here is a sample letter you can send as is, modify, or simply take some ideas from for your telephone call. You have lots of information on the subject. We know you can make this count.

Dear Senator ____________________ ,

Your Committee is now considering the approval of Bill C-6 which is a bill that I have very serious concerns about.

I am disturbed to learn that the Committee has not re-scheduled to hear from Shawn Buckley. I understand that he was offered a slot during a period of time which he was previously scheduled to be in Federal Court and that he has been denied the opportunity to be heard at a time when it is actually possible for him to attend.

I feel very strongly that Mr. Buckley is a uniquely qualified individual who truly speaks for the interest of Canadians. He is not only a Constitutional lawyer but also the author of the Canadian Charter of Health Freedom, which is a proposed legislation that nearly 40,000 Canadians have signed a petition supporting, with hundreds more signing on every single week.

I strongly believe that to proceed with your final analysis of Bill C-6 without hearing from Mr. Buckley would be a grave omission. One that would have not have heard from the voice of the Canadian public.

I urge you to hear from Shawn Buckley on November 25th, 2009.

Sincerely,

Your Name, City & Province Here

48 HRS TO PHONE, EMAIL & FAX

You can call the toll free line and ask for the Senator 1-800-267-7362 but
if you can afford long distance then call the direct line to each Senator’s office. Call all 13. Email all 13. Fax all 13.

THEN let CNHC know that you did.

Please help get Shawn Buckley to in front of the Senate Committee for the Senators and the Canadian public.

Banks, Tommy L (AB)
gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-1889   F: 613-995-1938

Callbeck, Catherine L (PE)callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-943-0686   F: 613-943-0693

Cordy, Jane L (NS)cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-8409   F: 613-995-8432

Dyck, Lillian Eva L (SK)dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-4318   F: 613-995-4331

Eaton, Nicole C (ON)eatonn@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-947-4047   F: 613-947-4044

Eggleton, Art L (ON)egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-4230   F: 613-995-4237

Fairbairn, Joyce L (AB)fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-996-4382   F: 613-995-3223

Martin, Yonah C (BC)martin@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-947-4078   F: 613-947-4082

Ogilvie, Kenneth C (NS)ogilvk@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-992-0331   F: 613-992-0334

Pépin, Lucie L (QC)pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-996-1726   F: 613-996-8392

Segal, Hugh C (ON)kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-4059   F: 613-995-5259

Keon, Wilbert Joseph C (ON)
keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-943-1415   F: 613-943-1796

Keli Hogan Committee Clerk!
hogank@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-993-9021

“For the first time in Canadian history”, lawyer Shawn Buckley explains, “Bill C-6 not only abolishes the law of trespass, but also allows warrants to be issued to search private homes without evidence of criminal wrongdoing*… in violation of Section 8 of the Charter.”

Watch the video of Shawn Buckley explaining Bill C-6

Dr Rima Laibow explains Codex Alimentarius
Pay attention-this is about your food, who controls it and the ramifications for you and your family.
For the full presentation hit the You Tube logo on the video or watch related videos after you Watch Part 1

Al Gore is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Club of Rome. Both are strange/secretive/elitist groups which have publicly stated their goals are to destroy Our Sovereignty in order to make the world a safer place. Please carefully read these quotes from the groups that our fellow Tennessean is a proud member of:

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. …The real enemy then is humanity itself.
Democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead.”—From the Club of Rome’s “The First Global Revolution” p. 71,75 1993

Editor:

Watch as John Laforet, President of  WCO,  skillfully takes  Peter Tabuns to task on wind farms and the green energy movement.  Watch the whole interview or jump in at the 5:30 mark.

Watch how John tears Tabuns apart and unmasks the lies of the Green Movement.

Well done John!

Hundreds brainstorm on making economy green at Toronto conference

By: Pat Hewitt, THE CANADIAN PRESS

TORONTO – How to stimulate Ontario’s economy while protecting the environment at the same time was the focus of the Good Green Jobs for All conference in Toronto on Saturday.

About 550 environmentalists, members of the labour movement and people interested in social justice attended the sold-out conference which featured speeches and workshops.

“There’s a huge opportunity out there to put people back to work and to rebuild Ontario’s industrial base, its manufacturing base,” said Ontario New Democrat environment critic Peter Tabuns, who was one of the speakers at the gathering.

In an interview, Tabuns said 250,000 people in Germany work in renewable power, while in Toledo, Ohio, 6,000 people work in the solar industry – many of whom used to make windshields for cars.

In Pennsylvania, the government signed a $650 million alternative energy bill into force in July, he said, and the state expects renewable energy will employ 10,000 people.

Billions of dollars have been invested in producing electric car batteries in Michigan and $1 billion has been invested into electric car production in Australia, said Tabuns.

“You can just see there is a tremendous opportunity for us to get jobs that are going to make a difference in people’s lives, and clean up the air and deal with climate change at the same time,” he said.

Wind turbines, solar panels, biogas generation plants, or expanding deep-lake water cooling are just some of the green technologies Ontario should be taking more advantage of to create jobs, said Tabuns.

Statistics Canada said Friday Canada’s struggling economy shed 43,200 jobs last month for a national jobless rate of 8.6 per cent, up from 8.4 per cent in September. Ontario’s unemployment rate rose a tenth of a point to 9.3 per cent in October.

Tabuns cited a recent study that said up to one million trades jobs could be created if every home in Canada was retrofitted to make it more energy efficient.

The former executive director of Greenpeace Canada said the conference was not so much a discussion about technology as one about how to get our society moving on a green jobs initiative and how to secure investment and government support – both financial and legislative.

The reality is people are going to need jobs and we have to deal with climate change, said Tabuns, adding the most productive to take on those issues is investing in renewable power.

Tabuns pointed to Denmark’s $6 billion-a-year wind power industry which employs more than 20,000 people.

But he said it’s important a “Made in Ontario” domestic manufacturing regulation keeps any green jobs created in the province instead of them shifting to countries where labour costs are cheaper.

“When governments are buying renewable energy technology or buying renewable electricity they need to specify the technologies that provide that electricity have a significant made in Ontario component,” Tabuns said.

The government Premier Dalton McGuinty has said it hopes its Green Energy Act will create 50,000 jobs and generate billions of dollars of economic growth in communities across Ontario within three years.

John Cartwright, president of the Toronto and York Region Labour Council who also spoke at the meeting, said greening the economy is not without its challenges.

“We’ve got a number of challenges and one is the influence and power of Big Oil,” Cartwright said in an interview.

He said the federal government listens too much to oil companies.

But Cartwright also said people’s attitudes must change.

“We’ve got to connect people and move them away from cynicism to saying we can and must adopt ways of living and ways of making things that are more in tune with the long-term environmental needs of this planet,” he said.

“Some of those old habits die hard.”

THE CANADIAN PRESS

Editor:

I received the information below via email today and decided to make some phone calls.  I spoke with several staff from the  offices listed below. My question to each of them was – Are you aware that Bill C-6 is a precursor to Codex Alimentarius?

Only one person I spoke with had  heard of Codex Alimentarius.  If the staffers never heard of Codex and its implications for Canada, what knowledge do the Senators have?

Do the Senators think  Bill C-6 is benign? Do they understand the implications for Canada and its people if  Bill C-6 passes?

Two things are apparent and need to be answered by the Senators.

1) If they do not understand the implications of Bill C-6 and Codex they are not in a position to make the decision they are being asked to make.

2) If they know,  they are traitors of Canada and its people.

Please contact the Senators below and do two things. Demand the committee accommodate Shawn Buckley and request information from the Senators pertaining to their knowledge of Codex Alimentarius.

Bill C-6 and Codex Alimentarius together are a powerful cocktail which poses a serious threat to the sovereignty of Canada.

Pick up the phone and start making calls.

48 HRS TO GET A CRITICAL MESSAGE TO 12 KEY SENATORS

Here’s the issue: Bill C-6 is now being reviewed by the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs. Their job is to review Bill C-6 in detail, hear from witnesses and make recommendations to the rest of Senators before the 3rd and final reading and vote. This Committee will give the rest of the Senate a final analysis of Bill C-6 based on what they have heard. But they will not have heard from Shawn Buckley.

And by extension, us.

Shawn Buckley, constitutional lawyer and author of the Charter of Health Freedom, has been invited as 1 of the key 14 national witnesses to appear before this Committee. That’s the great news.
To have him admitted to this chamber is an honour. And now, for the bad news. It’s on a day, when he will be in Federal Court. He is in a lock down at this trial for 3 weeks. He has been hired to challenge the validity of a section in the Food and Drug act, and show how the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is being violated. It is an unprecedented case and the Social Affairs Committee apparently, won’t wait.

As of Friday October 30th, the Committee has not given him another option to appear.

NO SUBSTITUTES

It is imperative that he be allowed to give his testimony before this Committee. We all know his perspective is absolutely essential and irreplaceable. There is no alternative. No one has spoken for us, for the Constitution.

The first phase of the Stop Bill C-6 Emailing and Letter Writing Campaign was successful. Many veteran and emerging Health Freedom groups, collectively, created a division in the Senate to force a review in Committee.
We made an impact and had emails quoted in the Senate, so they are hearing us.

THE BIG ASK

YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE AN EXPERT TO TALK TO THE SENATORS, THAT’S WHAT SHAWN IS FOR!

All we have to do is make our voice heard. And that we want Shawn Buckley to have the opportunity to truly represent our interests in detail.

Please take a few minutes to PHONE, EMAIL AND FAX your concerns.

It’s really easy to do and can make a big difference.

There are 12 senators and 1 committee clerk. We must reach them all so please contact as many people from the list below as you can! Our CNHC group is very active. Please GET YOUR ACTIVIST ON today and again tomorrow.

It’s best to send short, strong and constructive written communication by email or fax. This time we have to call because we can’t risk not being heard. Here is a sample letter you can send as is, modify, or simply take some ideas from for your telephone call. You have lots of information on the subject. We know you can make this count.

Dear Senator ____________________ ,

Your Committee is now considering the approval of Bill C-6 which is a bill that I have very serious concerns about.

I am disturbed to learn that the Committee has not re-scheduled to hear from Shawn Buckley. I understand that he was offered a slot during a period of time which he was previously scheduled to be in Federal Court and that he has been denied the opportunity to be heard at a time when it is actually possible for him to attend.

I feel very strongly that Mr. Buckley is a uniquely qualified individual who truly speaks for the interest of Canadians. He is not only a Constitutional lawyer but also the author of the Canadian Charter of Health Freedom, which is a proposed legislation that nearly 40,000 Canadians have signed a petition supporting, with hundreds more signing on every single week.

I strongly believe that to proceed with your final analysis of Bill C-6 without hearing from Mr. Buckley would be a grave omission. One that would have not have heard from the voice of the Canadian public.

I urge you to hear from Shawn Buckley on November 25th, 2009.

Sincerely,

Your Name, City & Province Here

48 HRS TO PHONE, EMAIL & FAX

You can call the toll free line and ask for the Senator 1-800-267-7362 but
if you can afford long distance then call the direct line to each Senator’s office. Call all 13. Email all 13. Fax all 13.

THEN let CNHC know that you did.

Please help get Shawn Buckley to in front of the Senate Committee for the Senators and the Canadian public.

Banks, Tommy L (AB)
gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-1889   F: 613-995-1938

Callbeck, Catherine L (PE)callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-943-0686   F: 613-943-0693

Cordy, Jane L (NS)cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-8409   F: 613-995-8432

Dyck, Lillian Eva L (SK)dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-4318   F: 613-995-4331

Eaton, Nicole C (ON)eatonn@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-947-4047   F: 613-947-4044

Eggleton, Art L (ON)egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-4230   F: 613-995-4237

Fairbairn, Joyce L (AB)fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-996-4382   F: 613-995-3223

Martin, Yonah C (BC)martin@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-947-4078   F: 613-947-4082

Ogilvie, Kenneth C (NS)ogilvk@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-992-0331   F: 613-992-0334

Pépin, Lucie L (QC)pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-996-1726   F: 613-996-8392

Segal, Hugh C (ON)kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-995-4059   F: 613-995-5259

Keon, Wilbert Joseph C (ON)
keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-943-1415   F: 613-943-1796

Keli Hogan Committee Clerk!
hogank@sen.parl.gc.ca

T: 613-993-9021

“For the first time in Canadian history”, lawyer Shawn Buckley explains, “Bill C-6 not only abolishes the law of trespass, but also allows warrants to be issued to search private homes without evidence of criminal wrongdoing*… in violation of Section 8 of the Charter.”

Watch the video of Shawn Buckley explaining Bill C-6

Dr Rima Laibow explains Codex Alimentarius
Pay attention-this is about your food, who controls it and the ramifications for you and your family.
For the full presentation hit the You Tube logo on the video or watch related videos after you Watch Part 1